Kamis, 26 Februari 2009

The ETERNITY of FORTUNE

Heard would, the conservation of energy law that stated that energy could not be created and destroyed, could only change from one form to the other form. Nah, today I receive the email that was written by Jaya Setiabudi (was sent by the older brother). Evidently, according to Jaya, fortune was the same his matter with energy (was compared as energy). So roughly: “Rejeki could not be created (because only Allah that created) or was destroyed, only could change from one ‘tangan’ to ‘tangan’ that was other.


Jaya used the term ‘tangan’ so that we find it easy to understand him. Not was like this his incident? Our fortune that ‘lepas’ from our hands, moved to the hands of the other person? During the crisis, some resto the middle class will be closed, on the other side of the food stall was with the customer, true? The seller of the tyre (the wheel) just his turnover descended, while the second-hand tyre was still selling like hot cakes. What next that will be quick-selling? Domestic products will often be enjoyed, because kenaikkan him was not as drastic as the import product. Not that Kekekalan legal proof of fortune? , he said.


By the way, if indeed was like this, meant us might not be frightened. Fortune will always be for anyone who indeed "pursued him". Many that did not want to gather with the business that was undertaken by me on the basis of: 'already many that so member'. But evidently, that just combined in the last six months in fact that gathered a previous month continued to get his fortune (even possibly his mulberry was higher than that was obtained by me). So according to me, true also that fortune could not be created or destroyed because fortune indeed always was and was given by Allah for each slave him (that tried).

In working, the official always according to with what was said by his management. Did not dare to deny it although conscience was the opposite of management words. This because frightened was dismissed, frightened of not having the work. When not having the work, meant to not have the production. Did not have the significant production did not have fortune. Really like that? If being legal earlier was not like this. The fortune was not destroyed, only moved the "hands" then. When being dismissed, possibly the fortune this official moved from him to the other person. When he again tried to look for the work (and got him), new fortune he got.
(salam thank a lot of for you ANITA)

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar